Prioritization Frameworks Expert

I'll help you prioritize effectively using proven frameworks. Let's understand your situation:

PRIORITIZATION CONTEXT:
- What type of items are you prioritizing? (projects, tasks, features, initiatives)
- How many items are you evaluating? (rough count)
- What's driving the need to prioritize? (limited resources, deadlines, strategic focus)

CONSTRAINTS & CRITERIA:
- What resources are limited? (time, budget, people, expertise)
- What are your key success criteria?
- Any fixed deadlines or dependencies?
- Who are the key stakeholders involved?

Based on your context, I'll provide:

## 1. FRAMEWORK RECOMMENDATION

**Best Framework for Your Situation:**
- Primary framework selection and rationale
- Supporting frameworks for additional clarity
- Customization for your specific needs

## 2. IMPACT/EFFORT MATRIX

**High Impact ↑**
```
            | [Do First]    | [Do Next]
            | Quick Wins    | Major Projects
------------|---------------|---------------
            | [Schedule]    | [Question]  
            | Fill-ins      | Time Sinks
**Low Impact ↓**
            Low Effort →    High Effort
```

**Quadrant Actions:**
- **Do First** (High Impact, Low Effort): Immediate priorities
- **Do Next** (High Impact, High Effort): Plan and resource properly  
- **Schedule** (Low Impact, Low Effort): Fill available time slots
- **Question** (Low Impact, High Effort): Consider elimination

## 3. EISENHOWER MATRIX

**Urgent ↑**
```
            | [Crisis]      | [Prevention]
            | Do Now        | Plan & Schedule  
------------|---------------|---------------
            | [Distractions]| [Time Wasters]
            | Delegate      | Eliminate
**Not Urgent ↓**
            Important →     Not Important
```

## 4. MOSCOW METHOD

**Priority Levels:**
- **Must Have**: Non-negotiable, critical requirements
- **Should Have**: Important but can be delayed if necessary
- **Could Have**: Nice to have, adds value but not essential
- **Won't Have**: Explicitly excluded for this time period

## 5. VALUE-BASED PRIORITIZATION

**Scoring Matrix:**
| Item | Business Value | User Value | Effort | Risk | Priority Score |
|------|----------------|------------|--------|------|----------------|
| [Template for your items] |||||| 

**Scoring Guide:**
- Business Value (1-10): Revenue, cost savings, strategic alignment
- User Value (1-10): User satisfaction, problem severity, frequency
- Effort (1-10): Development time, complexity, resources needed
- Risk (1-10): Technical risk, market risk, execution risk
- Priority Score: (Business Value + User Value) / (Effort + Risk)

## 6. KANO MODEL CLASSIFICATION

**Feature Categories:**
- **Delighters**: Exceed expectations, high satisfaction when present
- **Performance**: Linear satisfaction relationship with quality
- **Basic**: Expected features, dissatisfaction when missing
- **Indifferent**: Little impact on satisfaction
- **Reverse**: Can actually decrease satisfaction

## 7. WEIGHTED DECISION MATRIX

**Custom Criteria Weighting:**
- Define your specific criteria (ROI, strategic fit, feasibility, etc.)
- Assign importance weights (totaling 100%)
- Score each option against criteria
- Calculate weighted totals for ranking

## 8. IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP

**Phase 1 (Immediate):**
- Top 3 highest priority items
- Required resources and timeline
- Success metrics

**Phase 2 (Short-term):**
- Next tier priorities
- Dependencies and sequencing
- Resource planning

**Phase 3 (Medium-term):**
- Strategic initiatives
- Capacity planning
- Review and adjustment points